You have bought an Audemars AND Piquet watch

Mar 25, 2015,00:03 AM
 

duy8388vt


As you suspected, you have bought an authentic Audemars & Piq uet watch assembled ostensibly in Geneva.
That's what happens on eBay.

It is not an Audemars Piguet watch made in the Manufacture Audemars Piguet of Le Brassus, Switzerland.


Regards,
MTF
This message has been edited by MTF on 2015-03-25 00:09:08

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

need help to verify the authenticity of this watch. Please !!!

 
 By: duy8388vt : March 24th, 2015-19:17
Here is the watch that I have just bought on Ebay at the price Of $1550.00. The thing that concern me about its authentic is the dial. It says "Audemars & Piquet" instead of "Audemars, Piguet", the letter "Q" instead of the letter "G", and the "&"...  

You have bought an Audemars AND Piquet watch

 
 By: MTF : March 25th, 2015-00:03
duy8388vt As you suspected, you have bought an authentic Audemars & Pi q uet watch assembled ostensibly in Geneva. That's what happens on eBay. It is not an Audemars Piguet watch made in the Manufacture Audemars Piguet of Le Brassus, Switzerland. Rega... 

Respectfully disagree...

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-13:32
While suffering from poor condition, an incorrect replacement crown, and obviously poor redial, I suspect that the watch is in fact a genuine AP. The distinctive case appears entirely consistent with ultra-thins from the '60s, and I would surprised to fin... 

Neither the case back...

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-14:01
Appears "consistent" with those poor engravings. To have any kind of more certain idea we should si the inside of the case back, toghether with the movement. Regarda

I don't understand what you are talking about.

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-14:21
The case back has a personalized engraving, which could be entirely consistent with a genuine AP. The serial number is five digits, which is correct for the type. Of course seeing the inside of the case back and movement would be helpful, but I'd be willi... 

I'm talking about ...

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-16:55
The five digits engraved on the back (usually case numbers were engraved on the inside of the case back) and the quality of the engraving intself. The numbers itself appear inconsistent with the presumed age you suggested (60's) given that correspond to a...  

Numbers outside....

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-17:29
...sorry. But still incorrect for poorness of engraving and inconsistent with the age of the watch. Regards

You are wrong about this, as well.

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-17:46
Here's another example of an ultra-thin from the same era with a case number that was not perfectly aligned. Definitely original, and sold through this forum a long time ago. ...  

Maybe...

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-17:51
I still trust on what Martin Wehrli wrote. If those numbers are "aligned" i'm Naomi Campbell :-) We know AP shifted to the new case numbering with letters when they reached #100.000 in the early 70's. How can you consider "consistent" a case number of 4 d... 

What does a Royal Oak expert have to do with this discussion?

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-18:02
I have shown multiple examples of very similar (if not identical) models with similar case numbers, and yet for some unknown reason you fail to understand that they are typical of those models and period. I have also shown another misaligned example, and ... 

You are wrong.

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-17:36
I don't know where your understanding of AP's serial number system came from, but it is not accurate. Here's an example of a very similar model from an auction: Audemars Piguet, Mens, 18k Gold, Caliber 2003 Movement and another: Though the photos have b...  

My source...

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-17:45
Is the book from Brunner, Pfeiffer-Belli, Martin Wehrli. The only one about AP. Here is a case with consistent numbers Regards ...  

I've illustrated that your source is wrong...

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-17:48
the image doesn't show on your post, but I have posted several examples of similar five digit case numbers from the very same caliber ultra-thin models from the very same era. Would you like to argue that they are all fake, or from the early 1900s?

You have illustraded...

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-17:52
Just debatable case numbers and nothing else. Read my other reply and learn WHO is Martin Wehrli. The case showed in the picture doesn't appear has a 41xxx number (perfectly consistent with the early 50's) and show numbers perfectly aligned and engraved. ... 

Debatable case numbers?

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-18:08
You have provided no evidence whatsoever suggesting that the cases I have shown are not genuine. And you will not be able to, either, as they are genuine.

Also...

 
 By: Tony C. : March 25th, 2015-18:12
These ultra-thin models had both four and five digit case numbers, with the early production having only four.

I'm not questioning they're "genuine"

 
 By: ciaca : March 25th, 2015-18:16
...but that have inconsistent numbers. It's not the same thing. Now, if you are some AP employee or the director of the AP museum i can trust what you write, otherwise i still prefer to give credit to the director of AP museum. The world is plenty of vint...  

"inconsistent numbers"? There is no evidence of that at all.

 
 By: Tony C. : March 26th, 2015-03:20
I have no ides what you are referring to, as I have illustrated that the five digit number is entirely consistent with other examples of the same model from the same era. Perhaps you are again referring to either some mistaken set of numbers in a book, or... 

I have to agree with you, Tony...

 
 By: Emil Wojcik : March 28th, 2015-15:26
I sent a PM to the original poster before all this arguing about correct or incorrect numbers, etc began, advising him that it was most likely genuine based on the case style and construction, including the numbers that are consistent with this model AP w... 

Thank you, Emil...

 
 By: Tony C. : March 29th, 2015-04:28
please inform the forum (or ask the original poster to do so) after he has confirmed the movement and markings inside of the case back. Regards, Tony C.

You're most welcome, Tony...

 
 By: Emil Wojcik : March 30th, 2015-12:02
I PMed him, requesting that he keep us updated and I'll report back...assuming he answers of course. Emil

The new watch I have bought, but still not receive yet :)

 
 By: duy8388vt : March 30th, 2015-20:25
Hello guys, After a while thinking about the authentic of the watch, I decided to return the watch while the seller had not shipped it yet. I told him everything that I concerned about the authentic of the watch, he said that he did not know about that be...  

Looks genuine to me...

 
 By: Emil Wojcik : March 31st, 2015-11:49
Glad you decided to return the first one, that reprinted dial was a real problem to me. The dial on this one may also be an older reprint but it's so hard to tell from photos. When you get the watch, look at the printing on the dial very closely with a je...