Up Close and Personal with Royal Oak Chronograph 26300

Mar 12, 2014,11:32 AM
 

I have this 39mm ROC ref.26300 for more than a year and I must say that the level of details from every part of the watch has never failed to amaze me. I had a choice of either the new 41mm ROC ref. 26320 or this 39mm one at the time of purchase. After much trial on the wrist and long consideration, I decided on the 26300 as the classic size wears nicer on my wrist, and this reference looks sportier to me with the numeric seconds on the outer rim of the dial, the triangle 12-o'clock indicator, shorter hour indicators and a more cohesive monotone sub-dials with rail-track motif.



As all other RO, the tapisserie dial is one of the most attractive details of the watch. It is carved out from a blank piece of brass using a century-old machine. It is not difficult to observe those fine concentric lines weaving over the tiny squares of the tapisserie dial. Such pattern allows the dial to look more 'brilliant' when the light hits on it.



The case construction of the ROC is what attracted me to this reference. The entire watch looks decidedly masculine with a beefier octagonal bezel. The handsome screw-down chronograph pushers with hexagonal screw locks integrated beautifully with the smooth profile of the crown guards. The finishing of the ROC is unmatchable. My only gripe is that the AP logo on the crown would look more expensive if it is embossed rather than engraved.

 







I have to admit that the screw-down chronograph pushers are utterly inconvenient if you plan to use the chronograph function regularly. The screw locks are not easy to unscrew when the watch is on the wrist. It is possible to leave the locks at the unscrewed position, however the water resistance would be compromised. For me, all these functional issues are of no importance because I don't use my ROC for timekeeping. I happen to value its beautiful form rather than its functional substance.

 



The ROC is such a versatile watch it suits every occasion from casual to black tie. While it looks best in the remarkable RO bracelet, I find it equally stunning in leather strap. AP's leather strap is soft and very comfortable to wear, and it mellows down the glitter of ROC and transforms it into a very gentlemanly watch. 





Many people gripes about the lack of in-house movement for ROC. However, I find the F. Piguet movement very accurate and the chronograph pushers give the best feeling when depressed compared to all other chronographs I've handled so far. All in all, this ROC 26300 is a winner to me and it will remain in my small collection for a long time.

Thanks for reading!

Wayne


More posts: Royal OakRoyal Oak Chronograph

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

What a superb review!

 
 By: foversta : March 12th, 2014-13:16
Thanks a lot for this presentation of a watch I consider as one of the most beautiful chronographs... Your pics highlight its beauty. The FP movement? At least, it is an integrated chronograph movement... and a very valuable one... this is one answer to g... 

Thank you Fx!

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-06:51
You are absolutely right to say that ROC is one of the most beautiful chronographs :) Cheers!

Great review Wayne. While I completely understand the newer 41mm Royal Oak Chronograph...

 
 By: MichaelC : March 12th, 2014-14:23
I definitely prefer the 39mm model. The triangular marker at 12 is charming and unique. You have really captured the beauty of this watch with your photos. It is quite possibly the most successful "if you can only own one single AP" AP :-) Wear it with sh... 

My pleasure, Michael :)

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-06:59
Your kind words and constant support have been very important encouragement to me. Thanks so much!

Great review & pictures

 
 By: Edz : March 12th, 2014-16:06
I've bought and sold this watch a few times. I usually regret selling it because I reckon it's one of the best chronographs going around. The price on the secondhand market, I think, makes it a bargain. You're getting a hell of a watch for the money.

Seriously

 
 By: Spellbound : March 12th, 2014-16:23
Hey Wayne, Much as I think the watch is gorgeous, I am more blown away by your excellent photographic skills ! You should have a go posting on the weekly Wristscan and Static Photo competition on his forum. You will definitely win with this level of photo... 

You are too kind, Dean :)

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-07:28
Thanks for the encouragement. I'll try to post in other forums as as suggested :)

A great review on a great watch.

 
 By: Luis6 : March 12th, 2014-16:31
It fits you perfectly. The blue lume on silver white dial is just beautiful. I also have small wrists so fully appreciate the beauty of the 39mm case Royal Oaks.

Thanks so much, Luis :)

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-07:31
ROC's lume is beautiful indeed, but not long lasting enough for a sports watch… But... is ROC a sports watch or a sporty watch? :)

First up....

 
 By: tim_s : March 12th, 2014-18:39
I want to echo the amazing photo comments. These are all really impressive! I picked up a second hand 26300 in January, excuse the useless photo: I know I haven't owned it for long, but I completely agree with your comments. The finishing, especially the ...  

Congratulations, Tim! :)

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-07:58
If I were to choose a 26300 with a two-tone dial, your blue/orange dial would be my top choice. Great taste my friend :)

Great AP and wonderful photos.

 
 By: JerryW : March 12th, 2014-20:29
AP's only get better with more wrist time. Enjoy. JerryW

Really nice review Wayne thanks for sharing!!!

 
 By: emijar3 : March 12th, 2014-22:44
The post name should be "Royal Oak Chronograph All Access" excellent photos!!

newcomer

 
 By: vlkcheng : March 13th, 2014-05:06
Thanks for the wonderful review. I have been a fan of the ROC for a while. I recently pull the trigger after I saw some of the pix you've posted online previously. So Wayne my friend, a big thank you to you. Here's mine. ...  

Congratulations!!!

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-08:17
I'm very honored to have assisted in your decision-making, and you have certainly picked a winner in the ROC! Enjoy it in good health :)

Excellent!

 
 By: Anatol : March 13th, 2014-12:38
Thank you for this excellent review with wonderful photography of one of my favorite chronographs!

Thank you so much! :) [nt]

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-08:17

Great review!

 
 By: Sho-nuff : March 13th, 2014-15:22
What a great post, thank you for taking the time to do such a fantastic review. The watch looks amazing. I had one question. Does your 26300 have a 25860 dial swapped into it? Or is your 26300 one of the 'rare' models that was released during the transiti... 

Thank you of reading! Frankly...

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-08:25
I don't know if my ROC is special… It is a ref. 26300 and I believe the dial with grand tapisserie pattern is the latest and correct design to that reference according to all the catalogues and online materials I've seen. If I'm not wrong, the earlier ROC... 

Great review but have a question

 
 By: rvAp26300 : July 12th, 2020-08:45
thanks so much for the review. I am also interested in the 26300st because it's 39mm but wanted to ask if the pics you posted were the 26300st or a rare early edition 26300st with older 25860 dial? I ask because as I look at the used market and AP website... 

congrats Wayne, I went for the 41mm chrono as

 
 By: AK797 : March 16th, 2014-08:15
I think it is a better size for a chrono.

Thanks and congrats to you too!

 
 By: orangedial : March 16th, 2014-08:34
Both 39mm & 41mm ROC are nice, each has their uniqueness. I like the 39mm SS ROC better because it wears nicer on my wrist, and I prefer it's dial details compared to the 41mm one's. But when come to RGROC, the 41mm like yours is certainly outstandin... 

Can you express your love for this AP better than in picture 1?

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : March 17th, 2014-03:44
I doubt it: This image shows all your tender love and appreciation for this timepiece. Thank you so much! Magnus ...  

Thanks Magnus. That picture is one of my all-time favorites...

 
 By: orangedial : March 22nd, 2014-10:03
everything just fell in nicely when the photo was taken to celebrate my new ownership of this fine chronograph :)

Those photos are amazing

 
 By: ingmar : May 3rd, 2014-16:51
The details are exquisite. They never cease to amaze me as well. Thank you for taking them. I also agree w/ the sizing: 39mm just feels more right. For the chrono & the 15300, time only. Glad to have mine. Wearing it now & just love every angle.