Comments: view entire thread

 

On the Wrist Today:

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 18th, 2015-09:27
AP Royal Oak Jumbo. A pain to set the non-quick set date, but well worth the effort. Happy Wednesday! Best, CaliforniaJed...  

I'm wearing my

 
 By: dr.kol : February 18th, 2015-09:38
but miss my 15202. It's a very special watch. Best, Kari ...  

Looks great, Kari! [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 18th, 2015-10:29

Yes, quite a nice one

 
 By: dr.kol : February 18th, 2015-10:38
but behind 15202 IMO. Best, Kari

Elegancy...

 
 By: S.D.Quella : February 18th, 2015-09:50
...and purism. Words cannot do it any justice. Lovely wrist shot there. - Thanks for sharing. Sam.

Yes, that is the biggest flaw of the original and the re edition.

 
 By: amanico : February 18th, 2015-10:10
I agree that changing the date, with this angular crown, and the no quick date setting is a real pain... But what a charm! Nicolas

An excuse to add a 15305? ;-) [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 18th, 2015-10:29

Well, let's see what is a 15305, first....

 
 By: amanico : February 18th, 2015-10:58
Aaaah, well... YES! :) Best, Nicolas ...  

No worrying about the date! ;-) [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 18th, 2015-11:19

You read in my mind. ;)

 
 By: amanico : February 18th, 2015-13:38

Beautiful shot Jed!

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : February 18th, 2015-10:20
We can look at no quick date set function as flaw but obviously this watch is meant to be worn and not taken off the wrist so they thought that quick date function will be obsolete :) ;) Sincerely Damjan

I like your thinking, Damjan! [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 18th, 2015-10:30

Rubens Barrichello II Royal Oak Offshore

 
 By: MichaelC : February 19th, 2015-08:41
Mine is the titanium and ceramic version/ 1000 piece LE. I have been tardy in posting a detailed review on it; I will do that ASAP.

Please do! [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 20th, 2015-11:48

Indeed. It is THE one for me.

 
 By: MichaelC : February 19th, 2015-08:43
As I have mentioned before, it took me a while to figure that out, but it is total bliss every time I wear it.

Totally understand that. I have the same feeling with the JLC Amvox II.

 
 By: amanico : February 19th, 2015-22:39
And funnily, this is also a watch related to Cars.... Best, Nicolas

What a gorgeous pic Jed! [nt]

 
 By: foversta : February 18th, 2015-13:26

Thanks Fx!

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : March 2nd, 2015-21:50

it does have that rapid advance calendar system

 
 By: Arie - Mr Orange : February 18th, 2015-15:21
still a pain compared to a quickset system, but better than having to wind 24 hrs for 1 date change....

true on both accounts

 
 By: Arie - Mr Orange : February 19th, 2015-02:12
I've left it on a wrong date quite some times now. Maybe have to get winder for it because it sort of annoys me if the date is off. But at the moment I'm without the watch because it's still at AP being repaired :-(( I am thinking about getting it a perso... 

Jed, how do you use the date set when this watch does not hack?

 
 By: 4Js : February 19th, 2015-17:18
Setting from 10pm to 2am back and forth will ruin a non hack balance. I do not understand this? Thanks for your insight Best Joe

I can't help with the explanation, but

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : February 20th, 2015-09:42
the 10-2 back and forth is actually described in the manual for the watch as an appropriate means of setting the date, as I recall. Perhaps someone more technically familiar with the 2121 movement than I will jump in. Best, CaliforniaJed

Thanks DRMW! [nt]

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : March 2nd, 2015-21:52

Simplicity at its best!!

 
 By: emijar3 : February 20th, 2015-22:19
I think if there is only one watch to choose and used this will be the chosen! Great picture btw..

Agree entirely -- thanks!

 
 By: CaliforniaJed : March 2nd, 2015-21:52

That is a stunning shot, Jed.

 
 By: bar2020 : February 28th, 2015-14:23
Such a wonderful AP. Chris